Sketch descartes two thoedicie. does descartes need them both or could Term Paper

skeleton descartes two thoedicie. does descartes need them both or could he get away with only one - end point Paper ExampleHe begins by reiterating that there are only a hardly a(prenominal) things he can say with certainty about the human body, a few more about the mind, and moreover more about God.His first assumption is that God would never deceive him God being finished and all fraud and deception being im perfect(a) in some way or the other. He proceeds to suggest that his own sense of judgment, given him by the perfect, undeceiving God, should not commit wrongful conducts if used correctly. By this logic, Descartes and indeed every human being should not even be capable of erring. To explain this apparent fallacy in his reasoning, Descartes concludes that in the Great Chain of Being, the complete perfection of God on one end and the total absence of perfection on the other, man must lie someplace in between. Error is considered not a negative action, but the absence of the positive.He suggests a few other possibilities also, but pertinent to the scope of this paper is the Free Will versus Understanding theory. Descartes contends that neither the entrust nor the understanding is the bowel movement of errors it is only when the will is not restricted that mistakes occurWhence, then, spring my errors? They arise from this cause alone, that I do not restrain the will, which is of much wider range than the understanding, within the same limits, but have a bun in the oven it even to things I do not understand, and as the will is of itself indifferent to such, it readily falls into error and sin by choosing the false in room of the true, and evil instead of good.The root of error lies thus in the gift of Free Will bestowed on us. As we are allowed to choose, to make decisions, and not compelled by God to live out pre-ordained situations, we are also given the option of making mistakes, of erring something that the perfect God of Descartes is incapab le of doing, by His very definition.Although occasional errors are inevitable when one has free will, no person intentionally commits them. Even if the